Frnakenstein by Mary Shelley :

 Frankenstein by Mary Shelley : 

This blog assigned by Megha ma'am as a part of thinking activity. Frankenstein is novel published in 1818. 

Question : What are some major differences between the movie and the novel Frankenstein?

Answer : 

Frankenstein novel by Mary Shelley(1818) and Frankenstein movie by Kennath Branagh (1994). there is many difference between the original novel and movie such as, characters, tones. themes point, plot and etc. now we explored the all things step by step. 

1. Characterization:

• The Creature: In the novel, the creature is more complex and sympathetic, longing for companionship and driven to violence primarily due to rejection and isolation. The 1994 film portrays him as a more straightforward, monstrous villain, emphasizing his physical appearance and violent tendencies.

• Victor Frankenstein: The novel presents Victor as a tragic figure, consumed by his ambition and guilt. In the 1994 film, he is depicted as a more arrogant and driven character, with a focus on his scientific obsession.

2. Themes:

• Isolation and Rejection: The novel delves deeper into the themes of isolation, prejudice, and societal rejection faced by the creature. The 1994 film simplifies these themes, focusing more on the horror and spectacle associated with the creature's creation.

• The Dangers of Science: The novel explores the ethical implications of scientific pursuit and the potential consequences of playing God. The 1994 film emphasizes the horror and spectacle associated with the creature's creation, but also touches on the dangers of unchecked ambition.

3. Plot:

• The Creature's Story: The novel devotes significant time to the creature's perspective and his experiences. The 1994 film condenses or omits parts of his story to focus on the horror elements and the relationship between Victor and the creature.

Conclusion : 

These are just a few of the key differences between the novel and film versions of Frankenstein. It's important to note that there are many adaptations of the story, and each one may have its own unique interpretation and emphasis.

Question : Who do you think is a real monster?

Answer : 

The real villain of Frankenstein is not the creature despite his appearance and evil deeds. The real monster and antagonist of the novel is Victor, his creator. He first gives life to the beast pretending himself to be a God. Then, he abandons him, neither killing him nor teaching him the correct life principles.

Question : Do you think the search for knowledge is dangerous and destructive?

Answer : 

Frankenstein is filled with several different elements of the Gothic and Romantic Movement of British literature, and is considered to be one of the earliest forms of science fiction. Frankenstein is a very complicated and complex story that challenges different ethics and morals on the apparent theme of dangerous knowledge.

In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley considers knowledge as a “dangerous” factor. The danger of it is proved throughout the actions of the characters Robert Walton, Victor Frankenstein, and the creature. The characters all embody the theme of knowledge in different ways. Shelley supports her opinion about knowledge by using references from the Bible and Paradise Lost. She uses these references to show the relationship between God’s Adam and Frankenstein’s creature, and how nothing turns out as great as God’s creation. Mary Shelley’s goal is to teach a lesson on how destructive the desire for knowledge really is.

Question : Do you think Victor Frankenstein's creature was inherently evil, or did society's rejection and mistreatment turn him into a monster?

Answer : 

The creature in "Frankenstein" can be seen as inherently evil due to his violent action. The creature is not inherently evil; rather, his transformation into a monster is primarily a result of society's rejection and mistreatment. Initially, he seeks love and acceptance but is met with fear and hostility due to his appearance. This rejection leads him to despair and ultimately to revenge against Victor Frankenstein and humanity.

Question:  Should there be limits on scientific exploration? If so, what should those limits be?

Answer : 

Yes, limits on scientific exploration are necessary to ensure ethical practices, protect human and animal rights, and safeguard the environment. Key areas for these limits include:

1. Ethics: Respect for human and animal rights in research.

2. Environmental Protection: Avoiding harm to ecosystems and biodiversity.

3. Technology and Genetics: Regulating genetic engineering and AI to prevent misuse.

4. Safety and Security: Monitoring research that could be used for harmful purposes.

5. Public Involvement: Engaging the community in discussions and ensuring oversight.

Conclusion : 

In summary, setting limits helps promote responsible and beneficial scientific advancement.

Here i upload the pictures of our movie screening of Frankenstein.

Thank you !